These articles explore accountability, judgement and leadership under scrutiny. Drawing on experience across governance, regulation and independent oversight, they examine how consequential decisions are made, challenged and ultimately judged.
To receive new Insights from Fahm & Co. Subscribe.
Most leaders believe they are prepared for scrutiny, but often realise otherwise when it occurs. This gap is not about competence but about understanding what true scrutiny entails.
The Crime and Policing Act 2026 received Royal Assent on 29 April. Its corporate criminal liability provisions took effect on 29 June.
Making the right call is not the same as making a call that remains defensible — and the gap between the two is where accountability most often fails.
The higher the position, the fewer people will tell you what they actually think — and the more consequential that silence becomes.
Most senior leaders expect to be scrutinised — but the form scrutiny takes, and what it actually exposes, is rarely what they anticipated.
When authority changes hands, accountability does not — and the gap between the two is one of the most consistent sources of exposure in senior leadership.
20 Old Bailey
London EC4M 7AN
United Kingdom
